The Tarlton Law Library’s physical facility, including Special Collections, is closed until further notice. Tarlton’s librarians and staff remain actively engaged in providing library services. Student tech support (email@example.com) and faculty and student reference assistance (https://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/email) will be available during business hours. Students can also consult our Library and Technology Support FAQ (https://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/student-remote) for most frequently needed information.
A committee's report on a bill is considered one of the
most important pieces of a legislative history. Most bills die in committee. However, committees may report some bills for consideration by the House or Senate. (Only the House makes a written report a requirement.) A report can provide insight into the
committee's intent behind the sections of the reported legislation. Committee reports are issued as:
H. Rep.__-___ or S. Rep.__-___.
Conference Committee Reports:
If the House and Senate bill versions differ, a conference committee with members from both chambers is convened to work out a compromise. The accompanying report is equal to the committee report in importance, but it only addresses the differences between the House and Senate versions. It is valuable for determining the intent of the conferees. Conference reports are issued as house reports and are always reprinted in the Congressional Record, usually on the day it is filed.
Please note, access to certain databases linked in this guide may be restricted to UT Law or the UT community; please see the library's Databases page that lays out access privileges.
Review this example to see a report's standard elements:
Bluebook citation, Rule 13.4: H.R. Rep. No. 107-63 (2001).
View full-text at GPOAccess.
Review this example to see a conference report, which usually has two parts:
Bluebook citation, Rule 13.4: H.R. Rep. No. 107-63 (2001) (Conf. Rep.).
View full-text at GPOAccess.
Researchers can access reports through multiple sources. For an overview of the committee reports and the serial set please see LLSDC's website.
If you wind up needing a hearing or report in microfiche from CIS (via ProQuest Congressional or regular Lexis), then you will find it using what is called an accession number. Understanding the code behind the numbers can help in homing in on the right microfiche. The numbers are assigned each year and have five parts; the one for the sample report on the left is H343-6. As you can see, the first part is actually a letter indicating the issuing body: H=House, J=Joint, and S=Senate. The second and third parts identify the committee or special category. This sample report was issued by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, which is 34. The fourth part indicates the type of document (1=hearing and 3=report). So now we have H343. The last part is simply the numerical order of issuance, hence H341-6.
If looking up a statute in West's USCA, you will usually see--below the statutory text--the heading "Historical and Statutory Notes" with the subheading "Revision Notes and Legislative Reports." What "Legislative Reports" alludes to are those key pieces of legislative history, reports on a bill from a Congressional committee. It is here that USCA, unlike the official USC or Lexis' USCS, may provide citations to reports (not necessarily all) and an accompanying citation to where you can read an excerpted version in USCCAN.
The Conference Committee met multiple times before issuing its final report on the No Child Left Behind Act, dated Dec. 13, 2001. Below is footage from the sixth and final meeting two days before. C-SPAN also has footage available for the second meeting on Aug. 1, 2001.
U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News (USCCAN) is a unique resource published by West, available on Westlaw. It offers two sets of volumes per Congress: one set is a reprint of the Statutes at Large and the other set is labeled "Legislative History," containing lists of citations, selected, abridged reports, and presidential signing statements.
Thus USCCAN has characteristics of both a compilation and a list of citations. However, because it reprints only highlights from a law's legislative history, it is not a comprehensive source as either a compilation or a list. Still, it can be quite convenient to use--you will find references to the relevant portion of USCCAN listed section by section in the USCA. And because it focuses on the highlights, it can be a good first source to check.