The Tarlton Law Library is open at this time with access limited to current UT Law students, faculty, and staff. Members of the UT Austin community unaffiliated with the law school may contact the Circulation Desk (firstname.lastname@example.org, 512-471-7726) for assistance with accessing library resources. Online reference services are also available. Please see the Tarlton Reopening FAQs and the Texas Law Fall 2020 Reopening Plan for additional details
The materials in this section can be broadly grouped into two categories: (i) jurisdiction reform (often called “jurisdiction stripping”) and (ii) more general critiques of judicial review and the Supreme Court’s current role as the final arbiter of constitutionality.
Generally, the concept of jurisdiction stripping refers to Congress’ power to limit or curtail the appellate jurisdiction of federal courts, including the Supreme Court. In theory, through jurisdiction stripping, Congress could prohibit the Supreme Court from hearing categories of cases or hearing cases involving specific federal legislation. Reconsidering the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review over federal laws, on the other hand, is a broader and more expansive proposition.