Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

The Tarlton Law Library is open at this time with access limited to current UT Law students, faculty, and staff. Members of the UT Austin community unaffiliated with the law school may contact the Circulation Desk (circ@law.utexas.edu, 512-471-7726) for assistance with accessing library resources. Online reference services are also available. Please see the Tarlton Reopening FAQs and the Texas Law Fall 2020 Reopening Plan for additional details

Tarlton Law Library logo Texas Law Home Tarlton Law Library Home
Today's Operating Hours:

Big Tech/Social Media Regulation

This guide provides researchers with a curated selection of resources on Big Tech and social media regulation.

Summary

As complex technological systems have become increasingly intertwined with modern commerce, the Big Tech corporations that produce those systems have achieved a novel position in the marketplace. Amazon, Google, Apple, and Facebook, in particular, have diversified across a wide variety of business lines while also positioning themselves to provide foundational ecommerce infrastructure that rival businesses depend on. Despite their centrality in the market, the Big Tech firms have largely avoided antitrust scrutiny, even as they acquire smaller companies that provide a range of products and services. These organizations often argue that such practices are perfectly within the bounds of current law. Historically, antirust enforcement has been triggered when there are quantifiable threats to the welfare of average consumers. As these companies generally prioritize internal reinvestment, growth, and diversification over short term profits, they contend that consumers are in fact benefiting from their business practices (via wider selections and lower prices). However, some legal academics now advocate for updated antitrust enforcement measures that reflect the new risks posed by firms operating these kinds of centralized digital infrastructure products. Their scholarship explores a range of anticompetitive behaviors unique to digital markets, such as the dynamics of so-called "multi-sided markets," price collusion by algorithms without explicit human direction, strategic barriers to technological interoperability, and the mass aggregation of intellectual property through start-up acquisition.

Search Terms

algorithmic collusion, algorithmic pricing, anticompetitive behavior, antitrust, antitrust populism, consumer welfare standard, competition law, coordinated effects, digital market power, effective competition, multi-sided markets, multi-sided platform markets, nascent competitors, New Brandeis Movement, patent aggregation, platform economy, platform power, platform market power, price discrimination, search neutrality, two-sided markets, three-sided markets