The University of Texas at Austin

Law in Popular Culture collection

The Complete Newgate Calendar
Volume V

WILLIAM DUNCAN

Convicted for the Murder of his Master, William 
Chivers, Esq., and transported for Life, March, 1807

WILLIAM DUNCAN was employed in the service
of William Chivers, Esq., as gardener, at Clapham
Common. On the morning of the day of the murder,
after breakfast, the niece of Mr Chivers, who resided with
him, went in his carriage to take an airing. Mr Chivers, who
was between seventy and eighty years of age, went into his
garden to take a walk, as was his daily custom, inspecting
the gardener at his work, and conversing with him. About
half-past eleven o'clock the gardener ran into the house
from the garden, in great agitation and terror, exclaiming
to the servants : " Lord, what have I done ! I have struck
my master, and he has fallen "; and immediately left the
house, without giving any explanation, and made for the
town of Clapham. The footman went into the garden to
discover what had happened, when he found his master on
the ground, apparently lifeless, and his face a most shock-
ing spectacle. It appeared that the gardener had struck his
master with a spade that he was working with, the end of
which entered the lower part of his nose, broke both his jaw-
bones, and penetrated nearly to a line with his ears, so that
his head was almost separated. The gardener had inflicted
two deep wounds, one being about eight inches in length
and three inches and a half in breadth. Duncan was soon
after apprehended, and the magistrates committed him to
Horsemonger Lane Prison. The cause of the shocking act
was a dispute between him and his master respecting the
pruning of a vine.

[1]

   The jury, after having conferred for a considerable time,
found the prisoner guilty of murder ; and he was accordingly
sentenced to be executed on the Monday following, and to be
anatomised.
   The prisoner, during the whole of the time, conducted
himself with great composure. He was a man of respectable
appearance.
   The Privy Council, however, did not, it appears, conceive
that he was guilty of wilful and premeditated murder, but,
on the contrary, admitted an immediate provocation on the
part of the unfortunate old gentleman. They therefore
represented him as a subject for Royal clemency, in con-
sequence whereof he was twice respited, and then ordered
to be transported for the term of his natural life.

[2]


Newgate Calendar Vol. V Table of Contents / The Complete Newgate Calendar