The University of Texas at Austin

Law in Popular Culture collection

The Complete Newgate Calendar
Volume II

JOHN LARKIN

Who committed so many Forgeries and Cheats that he
had not Time to confess them all before he
died, on 19th of April, 1700

JOHN LARKIN was born at Antrim, in Ireland, of
very creditable parents, who, observing that their son
possessed a very considerable share of genius, took some
pains to cultivate it by a liberal education.
   When he had been some years at school, and obtained a
competent knowledge of several arts and sciences, he was

[124]

entered as a student in the University of Glasgow, in Scot-
land, where he went through his studies with applause, and
then, returning to Ireland, commenced as schoolmaster, in
which station he behaved himself so well that he met with
the greatest success; but being of an unsettled disposition
he left his school, and taking upon him the gown visited
the remotest parts of the kingdom and officiated in several
places as a clergyman.
   After some time he came to England, and was made
master of a free school in Lancashire, where he had about
a hundred scholars under his care; but he was so bad an
economist that he could by no means live within the bounds
of his income, and was therefore frequently contriving some
new methods by which he might support his extravagance.
   At length he came to a resolution to forge bonds and
other papers, in which pernicious practices he became so
great a proficient that he said he could forge almost any
hand so artfully that it would be difficult for a person to
know his own handwriting from the forgery.
   He acknowledged that he had frequently affixed the hand
of a bishop and several other eminent divines to letters-
testimonial, by which he had collected considerable sums
of money, under pretence of redeeming poor Christian
captives who were in slavery.
   He used also to forge goldsmiths' notes and bills of
exchange, and continued these practices for a considerable
time, but being at length detected he was pilloried, and
committed to prison till such time as he should discharge
a fine which was imposed on him, and which was so large
that he had little or no hopes of regaining his liberty.
   While he remained in prison some persons, who were
afterwards evidences against him at his trial, used to coin
money, and endeavoured to prevail upon him to assist them;
but he declared that he constantly refused to do it, that he
never shared any money with them, and had no further
concern than merely as a spectator. But as the contrary to
this had been so positively sworn, the ordinary of Newgate
suspected his sincerity, and urged him to make an ingenuous

[125]

confession. To which he replied that he knew his duty
extremely well, though he had acted contrary to it; but if
it should be his fate to die, he would, at the place of execu-
tion, discover something which might be a warning to
several persons who had been concerned in the like wicked
practices with himself.
   At the place of execution he informed the ordinary that
being confined in Newgate with one Charles Newey, who
was convicted of felony, and had been fined and pilloried
for suborning an evidence to swear falsely, he was prevailed
upon by Newey, in consideration of a sum of money, to
write a scurrilous libel, called The Case of Captain Charles
Newey
, containing very notorious falsehoods and scandal-
ous reflections on the Lord Chief Baron, the Recorder, and
other judges who tried the said Newey; for which he now
sincerely begged pardon of those gentlemen.
   He took a decent leave of the spectators, and having
returned thanks to the ordinary for his charitable visits to
him while under condemnation, he delivered him a paper
in which he said that though he was not guilty of the crime
of coining (for which he died), yet that he had committed
so many forgeries, cheats, etc., that it was almost impossible
to recount them. He thought it his duty to make all the
reparation in his power, by leaving the world a true narrative
of all his irregular proceedings, but not having sufficient
time to complete such a work, he mentioned only certain cir-
cumstances, which included a pretended plot, supposed to
have been carried on by the Earls of Marlborough (whose
hand he counterfeited with so much dexterity that it was
very difficult to discern the true from the false) and Salis-
bury, the Bishop of Rochester, and several others.
   This malefactor was executed at Tyburn, on the 19th of
April, 1700.

[126]


Newgate Calendar Vol. II Table of Contents / The Complete Newgate Calendar