The University of Texas at Austin

Law in Popular Culture collection

The Complete Newgate Calendar
Volume II

MARY CHANNEL

Famous for her Wit and Beauty, compelled to marry a
Man she detested, poisoned him, and was executed
in 1703, at the age of 18

MARY CHANNEL was the daughter of one Mr
Woods, a person of good repute, who resided in a
little village near Dorchester, in the county of Dorset.
He was a person of known wealth and good credit, who,

[148]

by his industry and diligence, daily increased his riches.
Perceiving his daughter to be of a promising disposition,
and amiable both in body and mind, he gave her a liberal
education, to improve and refine those good qualifications
by art and study wherewith she was liberally endowed by
the bounty of nature. She made so speedy a progress in
her learning that she soon outvied her schoolfellows; and
the strong imagination, polite behaviour and majestic graces
in her carriage so lively displayed themselves that she
became the mirror and discourse of all who knew her.
Though her birth gave place to those of the highest rank
and quality, yet her education was not inferior to them; and
her incomparable wit, united with her beautiful presence,
rendered her so agreeable that she was to be preferred even
to many of a superior rank.
   Her charms did not consist in adorning and dressing
herself in magnificent and gay attire, decked with pearls
and diamonds, which gives a false gloss of beauty to per-
sons whose natures are opposite, and only serve to brighten
the lustre of their pretended fine qualities. In a word,
she was generally esteemed the most celebrated wit and
accomplished beauty of her age.
   Being now in the flower of her youth and bloom of her
beauty, she had several suitors of good repute, who all
became captives to her beauty, and hardly did thcy find
themselves ensnared but they had the boldness to flatter
themselves with the hopes of one day possessing such a
charming object. Amongst the rest, one Mr Channel, a
wealthy grocer of Dorchester, came to pay his respects to
her, who, for the great riches he enjoyed, was gratefully
accepted by her parents, though by her altogether con-
temned and slighted. He had nothing to recommend him
but his wealth, which was as much superior to the rest of
her suitors as his person was inferior to them: his limbs
and body were in some measure ill proportioned, and his
features in no wise agreeable; but what rendered him the
more detestable and ridiculous in her sight was his splay-
foot, which did not in the least concur with her sublime and

[149]

lofty temper. Her father, evidently perceiving the addresses
of Mr Channel were received and accepted by her with
Scorn and reproofs, entreated her to receive him with less
disdain and listen to his respectful addresses. Being weary,
however, of his fond familiarities, she determined to aban-
don herself from him, and never more admit him into her
presence or society. She had no sooner put her design into
execution but it reached her father's ears, who kept a more
strict guard and watchful eye over her behaviour and con-
duct, and forthwith continued his absurd and unreasonable
expostulations and imprudent menaces to enforce and
augment her love. She in vain endeavoured to excuse her-
self, by disputing the most solid and rational arguments;
but how much the more she persisted, by so much the more
her parents' resolution was incensed and irritated, pressing
her to consent to a speedy marriage, and telling her she
would discharge the duty under which she was obligated
to them by assenting to and complying with their com-
mands. At length, being continually fatigued and impor-
tuned by her parents to have the marriage solemnised, she
consented, though with the greatest reluctance. And on
the day appointed the ceremony was ordained.
   Having now gratified her parents' desire, and yielded to
their compulsions, by putting the finishing stroke to her
marriage, she still continued her slights and contempts
towards her husband, and he became the entire object of
her scorn. Soon after the solemnisation of the marriage
she began to plot and contrive new scenes of tragedies, and
her thoughts were chiefly employed and taken up in study-
ing what measures to take to get rid of her husband, and
set herself at liberty. Nothing would satisfy her enormous
desires but his death, which she determined to bring about
by poison. And, in order thereto, she sent her maid to the
apothecary's for some white mercury, telling her it was to
kill rats and mice; though it is certain her design was
reverse, which she intended to fulfil as soon as opportunity
would give reins to her vicious inclinations. A little after
she gave orders for rice milk to be made for breakfast. That

[150]

morning, particularly, she was observed to demonstrate
a seeming diligence in procuring everyone theirr proper
messes; and no one was permitted to serve her husband
but herself. Accordingly she prepared and gave him the
poisonous draught, mixed and infused with the mercury,
which she had reserved for this desperate use, and which
proved his fatal dish. After he had eaten somewhat liberally
he discovered an ill savour in his milk, and said it tasted
amiss. Hereupon he offered his wife's brother (a youth who
boarded with him) to taste it; but she would by no means
permit her brother to comply with this reasonable request,
which caused a strong suspicion throughout the family.
  Then Mr Channel required the maid to taste it; but she
had no sooner taken it into her hands than her mistress in a
violent passion caught it from her, and forthwith conveyed
it away. It was now too late to recall what had passed, or
to seek for refuge; for his body presently began to swell
vehemently, perceiving which, the domestics immediately
sent for a doctor. But the infused mercury had so great
an effect upon him that no remedy could expel it, and he
expired before the physicians came to his assistance. Having
thus resigned his breath, and there being visible proofs of
his being poisoned, it was not without reason she was sus-
pected to be the principal and only actress and procurer
thereof. Thereupon she was immediately seized and con-
veyed before a justice, before whom she entirely denied the
fact; nevertheless, on her servants' information) he
committed her to Dorchester jail.
   At the assizes ensuing at Dorchester the defence she
made (whether it was real or pretended) was so full of wit
and ingenuity, and uttered with such an extraordinary
courage and humility, that it caused admiration in the
judges, and pity and compassion in all who heard her trial.
But this availed nothing; for the evidences appearing plain
against her, and the friends of her deceased husband being
very substantial people' she received sentence to be burned
at the stake till she was dead.
   The day whereon she was to suffer being come, she was

[151]

guarded by proper offlicers to the place of execution, with
her hood veiled over her face. After she had uttered some
private ejaculations she pulled off her gown and white silk
hood and delivered them to her maid -- who accompanied
her to the stake -- and then suffered death, according to the
sentence before pronounced against her, declaring her faith
in Christ; and to the last continued to exclaim against her
parents' constraints, which had been the sole cause of her
torturing death. Thus at a small distance from the town of
Dorchester she yielded her breath, in or about the month of
April, Anno Domini 1703, in the eighteenth year of her age,
being greatly bewailed and lamented, though the sentence
was acknowledged to be just and lawful.

[152]


Newgate Calendar Vol. II Table of Contents / The Complete Newgate Calendar