|
Volume 29, Number 2 (2005) reprinted by permission Legal Studies Forum CRIMES GONE BY
"THE SINISTER BEHIND THE ORDINARY":
The compelling title of Night Must Fall
sounds
like a literary quotation, but it is actually the result of a painstaking
search by actor-playwright Emlyn Williams for the simplest way of expressing
the idea that had inspired the play: "the sinister behind the ordinary."
Although all the characters in Night Must Fall talk about murder,
it is to the introspective Olivia Grayne that Williams assigns some of
his own characteristic comments on the manner in which murder is perceived
by the "ordinary" person. When Olivia learns that a murder has been committed
in the neighborhood, she finds it hard to grasp the idea that "there's
a man walking about somewhere, and talking, like us; and he woke up this
morning, and looked at the weather." In her mind a comfortable workaday
belief that murder is unreal alternates with a darker knowledge that it
coexists intimately with her and threatens the disruption of her living
pattern: "No, murder's a thing we read about in the papers; it isn't real
life; it can't touch us . . . but it can. And it's here. All round us.
In the forest . . . in this house. We're . . . living with it." And yet
when murder ultimately intrudes into her life, Olivia's emotion is less
that of horror than of surprise at its banality. "And that's murder," she
says. "But it's so ordinary. . . ."
[765] Because of his immersion in crime history,
we can believe what the play tells us about the murders it depicts; the
actuality that was furnished by his sources was far worse. For details
about the disposal of a corpse, Williams had cast his mind back to Patrick
Mahon's murder of his mistress Emily Kaye in a Sussex bungalow (1924) and
to Toni Mancini's clumsy concealment of the body of Violette Kaye (alias
Joan Watson) in his Brighton lodging (1934). In fact, it was Patrick Mahon's
crime that gave Williams the idea for what was to become one of the most
celebrated (and certainly one of the most horrific) props in modern stage
history -- the hat box in which a previous victim's head is hidden.
[766] prison terms. In March 1929 upon his release from prison he took his
mother Rosaline on a curious odyssey from hotel to hotel, always moving
without paying their bill. Finally, Fox had just about run out of potential
victims except his mother. On October 21, he left his mother ensconced
at the Metropole Hotel in Margate and went to London to arrange for the
extensions of two insurance policies on her life for a suspiciously short
period -- until midnight of Wednesday, October 23. He then returned to
Margate, where he accomplished the murder of his mother with precise timing
worthy of a veteran quarterback working the two-minute drill. At 11:40
P.M. on Wednesday, twenty minutes before the insurance expired, Fox rushed
downstairs into the lobby to report a fire in his mother's room. Her body
was quickly brought out into the hallway but she could not be revived.
At first Fox won sympathy as a grief-stricken son, but the tide soon turned
against him. While the doctor was examining his mother's body, the hotel
manager's wife consoled Fox by stroking his hair. When she prepared for
bed that night, she was surprised to find that her hand smelled strongly
of smoke and the next morning she reported her suspicions to the police.
A close inspection of Mrs. Fox's room indicated that the fire had been
started intentionally and her body was ordered exhumed. Famed forensic
scientist Sir Bernard Spilsbury found evidence that Mrs. Fox had been strangled
and the fire had been set to create an appearance of accident. Though other
doctors contested Spilsbury's conclusions, Fox was convicted and hanged.
The outcome had undoubtedly been influenced by Fox's emotionless demeanor
in the witness box, and by his incredible statement that on discovering
the fire, he closed the outer door of his mother's room so that "the smoke
should not spread into the hotel." Fox's callous courtroom behavior is
probably reflected in the Lord Chief Justice's speech, which serves as
a brief prologue to Night Must Fall.
[767] All this raw material obviously required considerable
reworking for the stage. Williams had started off with the murderer and
his second victim as son and mother but rejected the plan on the ground
that "absolute truth in the theatre can be too shocking." But as he worked
at his final design of the relationship, he did not stray too far from
his original intent, for the murderer cynically but effectively casts himself
into an imitation of a filial role. Moreover, his victim's niece, Olivia
Grayne, and her other visitors and attendants express feelings of extreme
hostility towards her. "She'll be found murdered one of these days," Olivia's
phlegmatic suitor Hubert Laurie correctly predicts, and Olivia cannot restrain
herself from saying to Dan, "I could kill her." These angry words recreate
much of the atmosphere of pervasive hatreds that is the hallmark of family
murder cases. The hostility of the onlookers to the murder victims is made
palatable in Night Must Fall by Williams's application of a theory
held by many crime writers -- that many victims have personal characteristics
that attract murderers. Williams's friend F. Tennyson Jesse coined the
term "murderee" to describe such victims and wrote that for every trunk
murderer there is a victim who is "trunkable," a person who may be nice
but is probably "rather foolish and wanton" as well. Of the victims in
Night
Must Fall, one suffers from twin manias (dipso and nympho), and the
other is in such an advanced stage of bullying hypochondria that, as Dan
observes, the only remedies left are artificial respiration and chocolates.
Actually, the theory that victims attract murderers through the failings
of their own personality is a consoling one since most of us consider ourselves
free of defects, but, as the twentieth century has progressed, we have
learned that victims, whether of individual or mass murder, can be distressingly
random.
[768] much more complex; though superficially he acts the role of a lady's
man pursuing a woman of repressed passion, he also shows uncanny insight
into the affinities between their personalities. Olivia and he are both
lonely, rebellious, resentful of their subordinate stations, and deeply
insecure. To her secret penchant for poetry he offers his flair for "speechifying"
and he can even match his insomnia and nightmares with hers. The final
irony of their interplay is that, though Olivia is afraid of violence,
the murderer is even more intensely afraid of the hundreds of people watching
behind each tree, the thousands of eyes, the "whole damn world" on his
track.
[769] BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES Studies of the murder cases on which Emlyn
Williams drew in Night Must Fall may be found in the following sources:
The
Trial of Patrick Mahon (New York: Charles Scribner's, 1928)(Edgar Wallace
introd.) (Famous Trials Series); H. Montgomery Hyde, Lord Justice: The
Life and Times of Lord Birkett of Ulverston 394-418 (New York: Random
House, 1965); Trevor Allen, "The Lady White Murder," in Famous Crimes
of Recent Times 52-67 (London: C. Arthur Pearson, 1928); William Roughead
(ed.), Trial of John Donald Merrett (Edinburgh: W. Hodge, 1929)(Notable
British Trials); F. Tennyson Jesse (ed.), Trial of Sidney Harry Fox
(Edinburgh: W. Hodge, 1934)(Notable British Trials); G.B. Stern, "The Le
Touquet Mystery," in Great Unsolved Crimes 197-204 (London: Hutchinson
& Co., 1935).
[770] * This article was previously published in 14 (3) Armchair Detective 284-286 (1981) and in A Gallery of Sinister Perspectives pp. 45-50. |
